Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Meryl Nass's avatar

Thanks for so carefully dissecting and elaborating on the efforts being made by the TOGETHER investigators to wiggle out of the scientific misconduct (or criminal misconduct) corner they have backed themselves into with their lies and obfuscations.

Keep digging that hole, PI's. How does it feel to know you've been caught creating a false narrative that could kill thousands? What will your children think of you?

Expand full comment
Anon's avatar

You see Alexandros they had to write that because the alternative doesn’t make for very good reading:

“Our expert clinicians in designing this trial laughably chose 1 dose, on the laughable basis of that is what is used to treat a different condition. Advocacy groups which included non-medically trained members of the public could even recognise the laughable nature of this incompetence, so therefore we had to change it to the lowest dose possible in order to minimise the chance of a positive result.

Additionally the Brazilian health authorities unfortunately do not have medical degrees we recognise but despite this we reluctantly acknowledged their recommendation for the public to take Ivermectin to treat covid. Almost certainly this did not effect the outcome of the study because we predetermined that Ivermectin doesn’t work anyway, and therefore it could not possibly change the results”

Doesn’t quite have the same ring to it does it?

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts