Great work Alex. I've just noticed that Edward Mills is the supervising author for this study but works for Cytel. He declares this on his form, and also his funding from the BMGF. But he doesn't declare his collaboration with Kristian Thorlund and Kyle Sheldrick in the pseudo-attack on molnupiravir (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35294804/). At the same time the conflict form includes two dates of submission - 21st Nov 2021 and 24th Feb 2022. This happens if there have been late additions to the authorship, after it was first submitted. The additional authorship relates to Craig Rayner who appears to be the late arrival and has multiple conflicts including Pfizer and the Australian government. The conflicts document is here (https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2115869/suppl_file/nejmoa2115869_disclosures.pdf). He is the founder of Certara, an organisation that is putatively involved in finding repurposed drugs. I would hazard a guess that the only repurposed drugs they have found for anything would be very expensive patented drugs, but that would be cynical. The whole thing stinks
Thank you for all that hard work, I love your penetrating and evenhanded analyses. But keeping it simple - IVM should be given within the first few days - 4 at most, preferably sooner. This trial as I understand it allowed 7 days from symptom onset - 8 in some cases including drug transport. Doesn't that invalidate the trial right then and there?
I’m very grateful to the people that look controversy in the eye and make the effort to expose this stinky business. The information is empowering - I feel I can make better health choices for myself and my family, and have gained a deep understanding of why and how my GP might (unwittingly) be uninformed.
Bravo! The most important factor: there was no interest in controlling if the people in the placebo arm started taking IVM (and other treatments) off protocol, considering everyone knew IVM was THE cure, and that you needed at least 5 days of IVM. More here: http://bit.ly/research2000
What a lot of work Alexandria! I would have liked to have seen doctors from the FLCCC comment on this along with Laurie, Rose, Ritsch etc. I wish those I know who refuse to look at preventatives read this, but their minds are already only in step with the fda, cdc, NEJM and whoever else is against repurposed drugs and natural herd immunity.
I don’t know if anyone pointed this out yet, but Merck’s own literature suggests 2.5x serum amplification with meal. i think your data was incorrect. . Dr. Charusa thinks you get an additional 50% with some butter. Beer also amplifies
Point being PK is a huge miss on this trial. Pointing the finger FDA by Boulware and Mills doesn’t cut it. Hard stop. Hard fail. FOIA all communication for public inquiry between FDA and Boulware/Mills
Why do you write "it’s unclear why they would choose a dose that was far less than the consensus recommendation at the time and for which absolutely no support of effectiveness existed." when the amended protocol specifies 400ug/kg/day for three days, which was clearly right in the heart of the FLCCC recommendation?
`I did my own research and found that there is no new district disease and no evidence what so ever for a viral cause of the old diseases IT's interesting to see who are the ones supporting the uncontrolled, invalid virology experiments and continuing the virus narrative of the globalists. https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Secrets-of-Virology-Control-Experiments:e
I do have one quibble, though it may just be confusion on my part. You share Steve Kirsch's quote of Dr. Mills above. Yes, that quote appears on Kirsch's page, but right before it Kirsch adds the disclaimer "The bold is mine." Thus, it's not at all clear that the bold statements were written by Dr. Mills -- only Kirsch knows -- and they're are certainly the most incredible portions of the quote.
The Problem with the TOGETHER Trial
Phenomenal work.
Great work Alex. I've just noticed that Edward Mills is the supervising author for this study but works for Cytel. He declares this on his form, and also his funding from the BMGF. But he doesn't declare his collaboration with Kristian Thorlund and Kyle Sheldrick in the pseudo-attack on molnupiravir (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35294804/). At the same time the conflict form includes two dates of submission - 21st Nov 2021 and 24th Feb 2022. This happens if there have been late additions to the authorship, after it was first submitted. The additional authorship relates to Craig Rayner who appears to be the late arrival and has multiple conflicts including Pfizer and the Australian government. The conflicts document is here (https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2115869/suppl_file/nejmoa2115869_disclosures.pdf). He is the founder of Certara, an organisation that is putatively involved in finding repurposed drugs. I would hazard a guess that the only repurposed drugs they have found for anything would be very expensive patented drugs, but that would be cynical. The whole thing stinks
Thank you for all that hard work, I love your penetrating and evenhanded analyses. But keeping it simple - IVM should be given within the first few days - 4 at most, preferably sooner. This trial as I understand it allowed 7 days from symptom onset - 8 in some cases including drug transport. Doesn't that invalidate the trial right then and there?
I’m very grateful to the people that look controversy in the eye and make the effort to expose this stinky business. The information is empowering - I feel I can make better health choices for myself and my family, and have gained a deep understanding of why and how my GP might (unwittingly) be uninformed.
Bravo! The most important factor: there was no interest in controlling if the people in the placebo arm started taking IVM (and other treatments) off protocol, considering everyone knew IVM was THE cure, and that you needed at least 5 days of IVM. More here: http://bit.ly/research2000
What a lot of work Alexandria! I would have liked to have seen doctors from the FLCCC comment on this along with Laurie, Rose, Ritsch etc. I wish those I know who refuse to look at preventatives read this, but their minds are already only in step with the fda, cdc, NEJM and whoever else is against repurposed drugs and natural herd immunity.
I don’t know if anyone pointed this out yet, but Merck’s own literature suggests 2.5x serum amplification with meal. i think your data was incorrect. . Dr. Charusa thinks you get an additional 50% with some butter. Beer also amplifies
Point being PK is a huge miss on this trial. Pointing the finger FDA by Boulware and Mills doesn’t cut it. Hard stop. Hard fail. FOIA all communication for public inquiry between FDA and Boulware/Mills
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FCDvUTCWYAITiKo?format=jpg&name=large
Many thanks, your efforts are so fully evident on dark horse with Bret
Thank you for your brilliant work Alexandros.
Thanks man, clear and comprehensible. You're doing great work.
This is phenomenal research and reporting!!!!
Why do you write "it’s unclear why they would choose a dose that was far less than the consensus recommendation at the time and for which absolutely no support of effectiveness existed." when the amended protocol specifies 400ug/kg/day for three days, which was clearly right in the heart of the FLCCC recommendation?
`I did my own research and found that there is no new district disease and no evidence what so ever for a viral cause of the old diseases IT's interesting to see who are the ones supporting the uncontrolled, invalid virology experiments and continuing the virus narrative of the globalists. https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Secrets-of-Virology-Control-Experiments:e
The is NO evidence of a virus; lab or wet market or other wise https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/seeing-is-believing
Jo
Hey, the monkey pox business has got me doing my own research on the original and worst vaccine- small pox https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/lets-hope-the-monkey-pox-nonsense?s=w you may be interested. Thanks, Jo
Fascinating analysis.
I do have one quibble, though it may just be confusion on my part. You share Steve Kirsch's quote of Dr. Mills above. Yes, that quote appears on Kirsch's page, but right before it Kirsch adds the disclaimer "The bold is mine." Thus, it's not at all clear that the bold statements were written by Dr. Mills -- only Kirsch knows -- and they're are certainly the most incredible portions of the quote.
Apparently an expert has concluded that nothing untoward happened in the Together Trial (except the mortality data!)
https://mobile.twitter.com/GidMK/status/1510862614452404226