The Potemkin argument is my public peer review of Scott Alexander’s essay on ivermectin. In this series of posts, I go through that essay in detail, working through the various claims made and examining their validity. My essays will follow the structure of Scott’s essay, structured in four primary units, with additional material to follow:
Your analysis is spot on. And your writing is so clear that I now read a study with more understanding. Thank you for your generous work.
You're doing good and important work - I'm waiting for the Takeaways!
Looks like you've published up through part 20 (?) - can you update this Index page? Thanks!
Thank you for doing this. It is good to see someone take Scott's ego down a notch. He has really gone downhill since he went full-time substacker.