Did Robert Malone invent mRNA vaccines? This article will answer—from first principles—a question that comes up surprisingly often in pandemic-related conversations. As always, I'll give you the primary sources along with my reasoning, so you can take my answer apart and put yours together.
As an ordinary, unscientifically-inclined person trying to make sense of anything to do with our apparently interminable Plague Era, I appreciate everyone with the gifts to credibly explain everything, or as much about everything as can possibly be hoped for.
And sometimes, without the right skillset, one can still go with one's gut in determining who might be a trustworthy guide and who might be just howling for attention.
I trust Boriquagato, I trust Eugyppius, I trust Igor Chudov, I trust you, and I've been strongly inclined to trust Dr. Robert Malone too, and you've done a fine service here. (I used to trust Berenson but his neuroses are overwhelming, and anyone who uses as many CAPS and exclamation points as Steve Hirsch gets put in my discard file eventually.)
Thank you so much for putting this together. One of the most annoying problems trying to reason with people is that they have been brainwashed that Malone is lying about being the initial progenitor of the mRNA platform. This is an evergreen resource to show people to decisively refute top to bottom.
My interpretation of this issue is that the purpose of the dispute is to discredit other things Malone says.
It seems that if the "inventor of mRNA vaccines" is put in dispute then by association Malone loses credibility over everything else he says. And then critics can simply say that Malone is aggrieved and is criticising the mRNA vaccines out of spite, having been never fully credited with their invention.
I think the picture is pretty clear: Malone was integral to the development of the technology irrespective of whatever anyone says. He is also an expert on vaccines (Covid and others) and therefore is a highly credible source for an opinion.
And further, it seems that despite his knowledge base, many seek to discredit his opinion based on him as a person, not the content of what he says as a bona fide expert.
To his credit, he seems to maintain his composure and decorum, which in my opinion increases his credibility
A very interesting piece Alexandros. I do remember reading your Twitter thread that comprised a good deal of this information so it's nice to see it written in a more formal piece.
Now, with that being said I think we're entering a time where appeal to authority is not something that we should rely on to such a great extent as we do, such that we should ask ourselves if it really matters if Dr. Malone was the inventor of the mRNA technology? Whether or not he was, does that change the veracity of his statements, or do we validate his claims solely through his role as being the inventor of mRNA technology?
For many of the medical professionals that comprise the FLCCC and other organizations criticizing the COVID narrative, I don't support them for the mere fact that they are medical professionals, but because their line of thinking and arguments are more rooted in scientific inquiry and logic than many COVID zealots.
So instead of someone's claim to fame, it may be more important to see whether they are making valid arguments and contributing to the discourse.
May 25, 2022·edited May 25, 2022Liked by Alexandros Marinos
This is brilliant, the toaster was such a great place to begin. What a fantabulous smack down of the distortionists who can see an example of how fact checking is done when you want truth. So excited to have this wonderful work to share and what an awesome gift to Dr Malone and all his supporters to see this case closed. Big time kudos & thanks it's priceless! <3
Do you have any particular research sources (databases, search engines, libraries etc) that you rely on to provide consistently accurate non biased peer reviewed information? How do you go about sifting through the endless amounts of information out there in a timely manner? Between the manipulation of Google and other search results, the deceptive and sometimes just straight up dishonest fact checkers and news sources it's been a struggle lately to navigate the web for research. When I really open things up and dive into tor it can be overwhelming trying to sift through the nonsense conspiracy theories in search for truth and actual conspiracy.
“ PS2: If you're interested Dr. Malone's views on what is going on with the pandemic, who should get vaccinated, and what the way forward is, I wrote up a portion of an interview he did recently. It's some of the most concise, incisive thinking I've come across:”
I’m glad you have the Luigi Warren tweet. I’ve been permanently banned from Twitter, but if you look back at Luigi Warden’s feed and what HE thinks of the vaccines snd who should get them, he makes Malone look like a Big Pharma shill by comparison. Once you get past the cat tweets, that is. I have never heard him interviewed, but would love to. He’s so abrasive — between cat tweets — which I love. If anyone knows of an interview, please share!
Than you Mr. Marinos for answering to me a question I wanted to be sure about; I am really impressed by the level of details and analysis; God bless you.
TurboCancer is what resulted in our learning about fenbendazole. Close relative, with no breast tissue from 2009 masectomy, developed metastatic BC “everywhere” in late 2021 after two moderna covid shots. Lung, bone, kidney, pancreas. At 83, she refused all treatment and went home to hospice care. Nothing to lose so she took fenbendazole (222 mg per day)...available from pet store or amazon. Cancer gone in 4 months, she felt and looked better in 1 month! Read her Case Report at https://fenbendazole.substack.com
No side effects! We don’t have to die from most solid tumor cancers any more! Fenben is cheap, OTC, side effect free antiparasitic medicine that eradicates most cancers. It will change your life to know that you can not worry about cancer. Read the Substack, all the science and supporting findings are there. Not selling a thing, not even subscriptions. This is a pay-it-forward effort to help others eradicate their cancers.
As an ordinary, unscientifically-inclined person trying to make sense of anything to do with our apparently interminable Plague Era, I appreciate everyone with the gifts to credibly explain everything, or as much about everything as can possibly be hoped for.
And sometimes, without the right skillset, one can still go with one's gut in determining who might be a trustworthy guide and who might be just howling for attention.
I trust Boriquagato, I trust Eugyppius, I trust Igor Chudov, I trust you, and I've been strongly inclined to trust Dr. Robert Malone too, and you've done a fine service here. (I used to trust Berenson but his neuroses are overwhelming, and anyone who uses as many CAPS and exclamation points as Steve Hirsch gets put in my discard file eventually.)
Thank you.
Thank you so much for putting this together. One of the most annoying problems trying to reason with people is that they have been brainwashed that Malone is lying about being the initial progenitor of the mRNA platform. This is an evergreen resource to show people to decisively refute top to bottom.
My interpretation of this issue is that the purpose of the dispute is to discredit other things Malone says.
It seems that if the "inventor of mRNA vaccines" is put in dispute then by association Malone loses credibility over everything else he says. And then critics can simply say that Malone is aggrieved and is criticising the mRNA vaccines out of spite, having been never fully credited with their invention.
I think the picture is pretty clear: Malone was integral to the development of the technology irrespective of whatever anyone says. He is also an expert on vaccines (Covid and others) and therefore is a highly credible source for an opinion.
And further, it seems that despite his knowledge base, many seek to discredit his opinion based on him as a person, not the content of what he says as a bona fide expert.
To his credit, he seems to maintain his composure and decorum, which in my opinion increases his credibility
A very interesting piece Alexandros. I do remember reading your Twitter thread that comprised a good deal of this information so it's nice to see it written in a more formal piece.
Now, with that being said I think we're entering a time where appeal to authority is not something that we should rely on to such a great extent as we do, such that we should ask ourselves if it really matters if Dr. Malone was the inventor of the mRNA technology? Whether or not he was, does that change the veracity of his statements, or do we validate his claims solely through his role as being the inventor of mRNA technology?
For many of the medical professionals that comprise the FLCCC and other organizations criticizing the COVID narrative, I don't support them for the mere fact that they are medical professionals, but because their line of thinking and arguments are more rooted in scientific inquiry and logic than many COVID zealots.
So instead of someone's claim to fame, it may be more important to see whether they are making valid arguments and contributing to the discourse.
Either way, great article Alexandros!
Excellent work Alexandros. You are a must read on a daily basis.
typo "In a later pubic filing, "
This is brilliant, the toaster was such a great place to begin. What a fantabulous smack down of the distortionists who can see an example of how fact checking is done when you want truth. So excited to have this wonderful work to share and what an awesome gift to Dr Malone and all his supporters to see this case closed. Big time kudos & thanks it's priceless! <3
It is great to see the evidence too! Appreciate so much....💪
I have listened to many many interviews with Dr Robert Malone, I find him to be gracious intelligent caring, integrity consumes his every word.
All your articles are well written, thought out and sourced. Thanks for your honest intellectual work and for sharing it!
Do you have any particular research sources (databases, search engines, libraries etc) that you rely on to provide consistently accurate non biased peer reviewed information? How do you go about sifting through the endless amounts of information out there in a timely manner? Between the manipulation of Google and other search results, the deceptive and sometimes just straight up dishonest fact checkers and news sources it's been a struggle lately to navigate the web for research. When I really open things up and dive into tor it can be overwhelming trying to sift through the nonsense conspiracy theories in search for truth and actual conspiracy.
In math, this article is analogous to "the book solution".
“ PS2: If you're interested Dr. Malone's views on what is going on with the pandemic, who should get vaccinated, and what the way forward is, I wrote up a portion of an interview he did recently. It's some of the most concise, incisive thinking I've come across:”
I’m glad you have the Luigi Warren tweet. I’ve been permanently banned from Twitter, but if you look back at Luigi Warden’s feed and what HE thinks of the vaccines snd who should get them, he makes Malone look like a Big Pharma shill by comparison. Once you get past the cat tweets, that is. I have never heard him interviewed, but would love to. He’s so abrasive — between cat tweets — which I love. If anyone knows of an interview, please share!
Than you Mr. Marinos for answering to me a question I wanted to be sure about; I am really impressed by the level of details and analysis; God bless you.
I highly suggest when resolving future (circular) disputes, such as the one with Fred, you try this technique: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1JWRFIzppA&list=FL1IzOwXIaIIG7LmfkRbUOzw&index=37
TurboCancer is what resulted in our learning about fenbendazole. Close relative, with no breast tissue from 2009 masectomy, developed metastatic BC “everywhere” in late 2021 after two moderna covid shots. Lung, bone, kidney, pancreas. At 83, she refused all treatment and went home to hospice care. Nothing to lose so she took fenbendazole (222 mg per day)...available from pet store or amazon. Cancer gone in 4 months, she felt and looked better in 1 month! Read her Case Report at https://fenbendazole.substack.com
No side effects! We don’t have to die from most solid tumor cancers any more! Fenben is cheap, OTC, side effect free antiparasitic medicine that eradicates most cancers. It will change your life to know that you can not worry about cancer. Read the Substack, all the science and supporting findings are there. Not selling a thing, not even subscriptions. This is a pay-it-forward effort to help others eradicate their cancers.